How to Be Correctly Paid in the “Always-On” Culture of Remote Work

Shavitz Law Group

After the Covid lockdown, many employees transitioned to remote or hybrid work. While this new work setting has been beneficial to many, it has also brought new complications, including complications related to compensation.

The standard rule for overtime compensation is that a non-exempt employee must work more than 40 hours a week to be eligible for overtime compensation. Under most scenarios, such an employee is entitled to time-and-a-half of their hourly rate for the hours worked over 40 in a work week.

Tracking hours worked remotely can be difficult, especially if an employer fails to implement policies and practices to track all of the time worked by employees.  For example, answering phone calls or responding to messages on days off or before or after work hours has become the norm.  Although employees may feel like such duties are simply expected by employers, such tasks count as work for which employees should be compensated. And, if that extra time spent answering calls or responding to texts puts an employee over 40 hours  for that work week, then the employee is entitled to be paid time-and-a-half for those hours worked over 40.

The desire to meet employers’ expectations can make it difficult for employees to differentiate between work time (which is compensable) and their own leisure time (which is not). When the line between work time and leisure time is blurred it can foster an “always-on” culture. “Always-on” manifests in a variety of ways, including constantly checking and responding to emails (even during dinner or other non-working time), responding to messages and calls when not working, and even joining  Zoom calls while on vacation. Because employees can feel that they are “always-on,” these activities often results in unpaid overtime hours. However, employers must pay for all hours worked, regardless of when or where, and this is  particularly true for employers which presume that employees are available at all times.

In order to ensure that they are paid for all of their hours worked in this “always-on” culture, it is helpful for employees working remotely to keep track of all of the time they work, including time associated with tasks performed while they are off-the-clock. Importantly, even if employees do not log or track their own time and the employer does not provide the means for capturing all hours worked – including hours worked remotely —  the law permits such employees to rely on their best estimate of their actual, total hours worked.

Non-Competes No Longer Valid

Shavitz Law Group

Understanding the FTC’s New Rule on Non-Compete Agreements

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has introduced a new rule that significant changes the landscape for non-compete agreements in the workplace. Effective September 4, 2024, most non-compete agreements with employees will no longer be enforceable.

Here’s a breakdown of what the new rule means for both employers and employees:

What is a Non-Compete Agreement?

A non-compete agreement is a contract between an employee and employer that restricts the employee from working for competitors or starting a competing business for a certain period after leaving the company. Non-competes typically are contained in employment contracts or agreements. While non-compete agreements aim to protect the employer’s business interests, but they can also limit employees’ job opportunities and mobility.

What’s Changing?

Pursuant to the new rule, employers can no longer enter into new non-compete agreements with employees. This includes senior executives—employees earning more than $151,164 per year who hold policy-making positions. However, existing non-compete agreements with these senior executives will remain valid. For all other employees, any existing non-compete agreements will become void. So the new rule is retroactive, except for C-suite, upper-level management employees.

Notice Requirements

Employers must inform both current and past employees that their non-compete agreements will not be enforced. This ensures that employees can seek or accept new job opportunities without fear of legal repercussions.

Exceptions

There are a few exceptions to the new rule:

1. Existing non-compete agreements with senior executives remain valid.

2. Non-compete agreements related to the sale of a business are still enforceable.

3. Any legal actions that arise before September 4, 2024, will not be affected by the new rule.

What the New Rule Means for Workers

Workers who previously remained with companies because of a non-compete would deprive them of other employment opportunities will no longer be restricted by the non-compete agreement. This gives employees more employment opportunities and mobility. As a consequence, employees should be in a better position to negotiate more favorable terms from their present employers.

If you or someone you know has been subject to a non-compete and you have questions about the new rule or any other aspect of your employment, please contact Shavitz Law Group at [email protected]

Is Your 401k Shrinking Based Upon the Stock Market or High Fees?

In these uncertain economic times, workers have witnessed wild gyrations in their 401k accounts. A downturn in your 401k may be the result of the overall stock market decline, but something else also may be at play.

Employers who offer 401k plans use plan fiduciaries – trusted financial experts – to invest employee funds. However, these experts sometimes fail in their fiduciary duty, in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

ERISA requires the 401k plan fiduciaries to objectively and adequately review the plan’s investment portfolio with due care to ensure that each investment option was prudent in terms of cost, among other factors. In other words: Your employer needs to pick financial experts to manage the 401k plan who are looking out for the investor-employees’ best interests. ERISA violations may include the failure of the plan manager to minimize costs to the employee-investors by investing in more expensive funds when less expensive, comparable plans offering similar returns are available.

In these difficult economic times, finding out that you are paying for a “Cadillac” plan when a “Toyota” will provide comparable risks and returns at significantly less cost, is another hit to your wallet. Take a moment to review those 401k statements, with particular attention to the fees and costs. If you have questions, contact The Shavitz Law Group. You can call us at 800-616-4800, and we would be happy to assist you in a free consultation to discuss your employment concerns

YOU EARNED IT, NOW LETS GO GET IT.

Gregg Shavitz, Shavitz Law Group, 951 Yamato Rd Ste 285, Boca Raton, FL and 800 3rd Ave, Suite 2800, New York, NY. Lawyers licensed in states including FL, NY, NJ, and TX. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based on advertisements alone.
Attorney Advertising

Employers on Wall Street Punish Women for Having Children In 2018

Shavitz Law Group

Another day, another gender discrimination claim against a Wall Street firm.  In a recent article written by Bloomberg News, it was reported that a star performer and 15-year veteran at Goldman Sachs was fired while she was on maternity leave.  The former Vice President alleges, despite successfully managing more than 300 million dollars for Goldman’s clients, that Goldman Sachs terminated her because the firm did not believe she would be able to balance her work and home life due to her being on maternity leave.

It is not the first time that a large company has been sued for gender discrimination against pregnant women or new mothers.  Time Magazine and the New York Times also published pieces detailing “rampant” discrimination against pregnant women and new mothers.

The complaints all detail a common theme:  companies do not believe that women can balance their work and personal lives and that families will prevent women from performing at a high level.

Pregnancy-based discrimination is illegal. The law expressly prohibits companies from discriminating against women because of a pregnancy or childbirth.

Shavitz Law Group, P.A. is dedicated to protecting the rights of women and preventing companies from discriminating against them because they chose to have a family life. If you feel you’ve been discriminated against at work based on your gender, please contact us at [email protected] or (800) 616-4000 or complete the Contact Us form on our website shavitzlaw.com, and a member of our law firm will contact you for an evaluation of your case.

The content of the article is for informational purposes only and does not contain legal or other advice and/or opinions. Shares and posts are not endorsements.